Regulatory Science Competition Spurs Innovation

Regulatory Science Winner Photo_020514

(L to R) Scott Steele, PhD, Karl Kieburtz, MD, MPH, David Brodell, Joan Adamo, PhD

A new UR contest is encouraging students and trainees, as well as the whole research community, to think about how to turn advances in basic and applied sciences more quickly – and safely – into new ways to improve health.

The FDA launched its Regulatory Science initiative in 2010.  The intention is to foster the development of new tools, standards, and approaches to assess the safety, efficacy and quality of any products regulated by the FDA.

These objectives, including creating ways to improve the complex drug and device development process, as well as strengthening social and behavioral science to lead to informed decisions, compliment the NIH’s Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program.  The CTSA program, which URMC has participated in since 2006, was designed, in part, to create a new generation of researchers, physicians, and research professionals with the skills to undertake successful clinical research.

Last week, the UR Office of Research Alliances and the Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) hosted and sponsored the inaugural “America’s Got Regulatory Science Talent Competition.” Entrants were asked to submit and then present ideas that addressed FDA priority areas such as improving clinical studies and evaluation, harnessing diverse data through information sciences to improve health outcomes, developing prevention focused food safety systems, and strengthening social and behavioral science leading to informed decisions.

Three teams submitted proposals for the competition:

Team Cardioid (David Brodell) – The process of determining whether an experimental drug will be toxic to the heart could be transformed through the use of advanced computational simulations. In collaboration with IBM, URMC researchers are working to better understand the mechanisms associated with drug-induced ion-channel dysfunction through work with a complex computer model of the human heart made using the University’s Blue Gene/Q supercomputer.

Team Bio-Logic (Michael Moses and Allen Bennett) – E-cigarettes sales are increasing at an alarming rate. The long-term safety of E-cigarettes has not been scientifically tested nor are they currently regulated by the FDA unlike traditional cigarettes.  It is proposed that product standards be established for e-cigarettes which include toxicology data to support safety and labeling to increase awareness and educated decision-making for consumers.

Team Report-It (Abeer Abu-Zeitone) – A FDA-approved user friendly, smart phone application that links (via a QR code) dietary supplement products and information about the product could facilitate the reporting of adverse events associated with their use and make this information more accessible to the public.

Competition organizers Joan Adamo, PhD, Associate Director of Regulatory Services at the University and Scott Steele, PhD, Director of Research Alliances agreed that the entrants went above and beyond to assemble insightful projects which touched on several FDA Regulatory Science Priority Areas.  Steele noted that “Given our research and educational programs, the CTSI, the Center for Medical Technology and Innovation, and participation in a number of national networks, the University is well positioned to address Regulatory Science challenges.  This competition is an important element of increasing awareness of how our research and training initiatives can directly impact national Regulatory Science needs”.  Competition co-organizer Joan Adamo said, “Many of the faculty here are already doing work which has regulatory implications not that far down the road.  We hope that by engaging them and their students in informal ways like this, we will be able to help them to see the practical application of their work to the formation of Federal Regulations.  This will also help them as they apply for grants which ask them to speak to the Regulatory Science aspects of the proposed projects. ”

The competition is a partnership with the University of Maryland, which is home to a FDA-supported Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation.  The winner – David Brodell of Team Cardioid – will be traveling to Washington, DC to meet the winners from the Maryland competition and present their ideas directly to the FDA.

Judges for the competition came from UR (Greg Gdowski, PhD from the Center for Medical Technology and Innovation and Biomedical Engineering), URMC (Eric Rubinstein, JD, MPH – CTSI) and from a local industry (Christine Ehmann, MS from Carestream Health).

Said one of the competition contestants, pathology graduate student Michael Moses, “I really learned so much in researching this project.  While it is not the focus of my graduate studies, during the past few weeks, our team has learned a great deal about the current tobacco regulations and how the FDA could have an even greater presence.”

The competition is one of several events and initiatives organized by the CTSI and the Office of Research Alliances to promote Regulatory Science awareness and opportunities.  A list of Regulatory Science news, events, and funding opportunities can be found at

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s